January 15, 2014 South Carolina Court of Appeals published opinion

 

Burgess v Burgess

Husband challenged the imputed income, alimony, and attorney fee and property division of the divorce decree. The panel affirmed in part and remanded. It held that the family court failed to consider the job opportunities in the relevant market and also failed to explain how it arrived at the value of husband’s imputed income. The panel therefore remanded for further consideration. Because the alimony and attorney fee provisions were based on the income finding, those issues were also remanded. The panel affirmed the property division finding the challenges were not preserved.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s