April 9, 2014 South CArolina Court of Appeals published opinion

State v Portillo

Portillo was convicted of sexual abuse of his niece. He challenged the trial court qualification of an expert on forensic interviewing. The panel affirmed. It held the trial court did error in qualifying the expert as the South Carolina supreme Court had prohibit such experts and that the witness here made statements that the niece did not appear to be coached and had symptoms consistent with PTSD suggesting belief in her veracity. However, the panel held that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt given some physical evidence consistent with the alleged abuse and the report of the abuse within minutes to Protillo’s wife.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s