June 16, 2014 4th Circuit published opinion

Under Seal v United States

John Doe moved to quash his grand jury subpoena arguing it violated the parent-child privilege under Federal Rules of Evidence 501. The district court granted his motion. The panel reversed. Noting that the privilege had been uniformly rejected by federal courts of appeal, the panel held that this case did not support recognition of privilege as Doe is 19, would not suffer any negative consequences form testifying, is the only adult witness available to testify to the facts of the incident, may not be required to give testimony damaging to his father and the strong policy of making everyone’s testimony available to parties is not served by recognizing the privilege.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s