-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
Categories
- Articles Worth Reading
- Bar Prep
- Book Review
- CALI
- Charleston School of Law News
- Classcaster
- CSOL News
- Electronic legal database
- Graduate Access
- Guest Blog
- Historical Legal Research
- Law Practice Software
- Legal instruction
- Legal Research
- Library Acquisitions
- Library hours
- Library Resources
- Library service
- President Ed Bell
- South Carolina Court of Appeals Opinion Summaries
- South Carolina Judicial Advisory Opinions
- South Carolina Supreme Court News
- South Carolina Supreme Court Opinions
- Training Sessions
- Uncategorized
- United States Supreme Court
- Weather Closure
- WestlawNext
Meta
Tag Archives: attorney fee award
South Carolina Court of Appeals Opinion 2-25-15
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, the Court of Appeals handed down a decision in Srivastava v. Srivastava. In this divorce action, Jane Srivastava (Wife) appeals the family court’s final order. Ms. Srivastava argues that the family court erred by: (1) failing … Continue reading
August 20, 2014 South Carolina Supreme Court opinions
Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina Inc. v City of Columbia I Stevens provided architectural services to City on a hotel project. Stevens sent a letter offering to continue to provide services after the initial period and City authorized payment … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged attorney fee award, auto liability insurance, contract formation, corporate promoters, motion to compel arbitration, review of unpreserved error, South Carolina freedom of information act, unfairly prejudicial evidence, unjust enrichment, void as against public policy
Leave a comment
June 4, 2014 South Carolina Court of Appeals published opinion
Brown v Brown Father appealed the award of attorney fees to wife. The panel reversed. It held that the fee award was improper here as father obtained a beneficial result of a reduced child support amount based on his successful … Continue reading
March 25, 2014 4th Circuit published opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Propak Logistics, Inc. After dismissing Commission’s Title VII complaint on laches grounds, the district court awarded Propak attorney fees ruling Commission’s case was effectively moot when filed. The panel, with one judge adding a separate … Continue reading
March 11, 2014 4th Circuit published opinions
Barton v House of Raeford Farms, Incorporated Barton and other employees sued farms alleging wage and retaliation claims. The district court granted summary judgment to Farms on the federal wage claim and a jury found in favor of several plaintiffs … Continue reading
December 12, 2013 4th Circuit published opinions
United States ex rel May and Radcliffe v Purdue Pharma, L.P. Radcliffe’s husband brought a qui tam suit against Purdue which was dismissed based on a release he had signed with Purdue. Maya and Radcliffe brought a qui tam suit … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 1983 action, attorney fee award, qualified immunity, qui tam suits, res judicata, retroactive laws
Leave a comment
November 20, 2013 4th Circuit published opinions
Turner v United States Turner and her husband went overboard during a storm. The Coast Guard, based on the information Turner’s father in law provided, did not begin active search and rescue until Turner’s boat was found the day after … Continue reading
October 23, 2013 South Carolina Supreme Court published opinions
Austin v Stokes-Craven Holding Corp. Austin filed a motion for trial, appellate and post-appellate attorney fees based on his successful appeal in the South Carolina Supreme Court concerning fraudulent behavior by Stokes-Craven. This was granted as to trial fees, but, the circuit … Continue reading
November 5, 2012 United States Supreme Court opinion
Lefemine v Wideman Lefemine held an antiabortion protest which included graphic pictures of fetuses. The sheriff ordered them removed and threatened arrest if they were not. Later, the sheriff told Lefemine that any similar display would result in the same … Continue reading
July 25, 2012 South Carolina Court of Appeals published opinions
Broach and Loomis v Carter Broach and Loomis entered two independent contractor agreements with a real estate agency to presell and sell condominium units. As a result of a financing agreement, the agency and the managing entity of the condominium … Continue reading
