Tag Archives: ineffective assistance

August 27, 2014 South Carolina Court of Appeals published opinions

Bagwell v State Bagwell moved for post conviction relief arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court denied his motion. The panel, 2-1, reversed. The majority held that trial counsel was ineffective when she failed to have blood samples form … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

July 23, 2014 South Carolina Supreme Court published opinions

Ashley II of Charleston, LLC v PCS Nitrogen, Inc. The federal district court certified a question to the Court asking if the negligence bar to enforcing an indemnity agreement applies in the context of contribution under the federal CERCLA statute. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

April 15, 2014 4th Circuit published opinion

United States v Galloway Galloway was convicted of drug trafficking. The panel affirmed. It held that the record did not plainly demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel because there were only allegations by Galloway and denials by the attorney in the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

March 19, 2014 South CArolina Court of Appeals published opinions

Beckman v Sysco Columbia, LLC Beckman injured his back and Sysco accepted his claim for workers compensation. The appellate panel awarded scheduled permanent disability benefits under South Carolina Code 42-9-30 ruling the only injury sustained was to Beckman’s back. The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

March 19, 2014 South Carolina Supreme Court published opinions

In the Matter of the Estate of Charles Rider (Carolyn Rider v Estate of Charles Rider et al.) Shortly before his death, Charles ordered his bank to transfer securities to a new account in Carolyn’s name. Two transfers took place … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

February 24, 2014 United States Supreme Court opinion

Hinton v Alabama Hinton was charged with murder. His trial attorney did not research the law on what funding was available for experts and thus failed to ask for additional funds to seek a better expert. Hinton was convicted and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

February 5, 2014 South Carolina Court of Appeals published opinions

Wilds v State Wilds sought post-conviction relief arguing his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to certain restrictions on cross examination and appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a jury instruction issue on appeal. The circuit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment